Smart Skin Care Forums
Home  -   Forum Index  -   Search  -   Register  -   Profile  -   Log in  -   FAQ  -   Contact Us

raw food versus cooked food diet

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Smart Skin Care Forum Index -> Skin and Nutrition
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
may
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:53 pm    Post subject: raw food versus cooked food diet Reply with quote

from what i've been able to glean from abstracts obtained through medscape, etc., cooked meat is particularly bad for you. of course, many arguments are also made that cooked vegetables and fruit are also, at the very least, seriously nutritionally impoverished. i am persuaded by some, but by no means all, the arguments in favour of eating a largely raw diet over a largely cooked one. either way, i am currently trying a (largely but not obsessively) lacto (or, rather, yoghurt)-vegtarian raw diet. my reason is that i am in the midst of an intellectually demanding job and need to have as clear a mind as possible. i felt that ditching all processed foods, sucrose, caffeine and wheat products for a start would help 'uncloud' my thinking. (so far, so good. and my mood has improved drastically.)

anyway, there has also been much written on raw food websites about the amazing 'glowing skin' one gets from eating a raw food diet. i was wondering whether you have seen/met many raw foodists and can testify that their diet does seem to benefit their skin, or whether you can think of any reason that raw foodists might 'glow' (beyond the fact that they would be getting more nutrients than the vast number of westerners who cook their food until it's mushy)?
Back to top
drtodorov
Site Admin


Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 2896

PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am not sure that benefits are as dramatic as to manifest via skin glow but it is true that raw foods, particularly fruits and vegetables have a wide array of antioxidants and other micronutrients some of which are lost during cooking.

Keep in mind that the extent of nutritional difference between raw and cooked food depends on the method of cooking - how prolonged and intense the heat treatment is, how much are micronutrients washed out (e.g. into unused boiling water), etc. Some methods of cooking are far healthier than others.

I reasonable alternative to completely raw diet would be a diet with lots of raw fruit, vegetables (and corresponding fresh fruit/veg juices) as well as moderately cooked whole grains, etc... FIY, one should be very careful with raw fish, meat and other animal products due to serious dangers of GI infections. For those, cooking (as long as it is not excessive) is a sterilization tool and probably has more pros than cons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
cjdavis



Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 196
Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

drtodorov wrote:
I am not sure that benefits are as dramatic as to manifest via skin glow but it is true that raw foods, particularly fruits and vegetables have a wide array of antioxidants and other micronutrients some of which are lost during cooking.

Keep in mind that the extent of nutritional difference between raw and cooked food depends on the method of cooking - how prolonged and intense the heat treatment is, how much are micronutrients washed out (e.g. into unused boiling water), etc. Some methods of cooking are far healthier than others.

I reasonable alternative to completely raw diet would be a diet with lots of raw fruit, vegetables (and corresponding fresh fruit/veg juices) as well as moderately cooked whole grains, etc... FIY, one should be very careful with raw fish, meat and other animal products due to serious dangers of GI infections. For those, cooking (as long as it is not excessive) is a sterilization tool and probably has more pros than cons.

I juice like there is no tomorrow. I use mostly high o.r.a.c. leafy green veggies and some other antioxidant containing foods that score low on the o.r.a.c. (which only measures the quenching of the peroxy radical) but are efficient at attacking other free radicals (such as superoxides, singlet oxygen, hydroxyl, etc) such as high carotenoid vegetables. I feel this is a terrific way to get maximal amounts of nutrients and antioxidants into the bloodstream. Dr. Todorov, do you think that I may be over exposing myself to toxins from pesticides given the fact that I eat extreme amounts of uncooked vegetables and fruits? I really can't afford to buy organic so I just wash the food the best that I can. I appreciate any input you can give me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
drtodorov
Site Admin


Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 2896

PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Many pesticides are not destroyed by cooking, so the exposure would be similar whether you eat cooked or uncooked fruits and veggies (assuming commensurate amounts).

Unfortunately, there is not enough hard science to evaluate the net benefits / risks of eating lots of fruits and vegetables. My feeling is that the meadia inspired fears of pesticides in food are at least somewhat overblown, but I haven't seen enough data to be sure either way.

Ironically, genetically modified foods may turn out safer in that regard as then shouldn't require as much pesticides.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SteveF



Joined: 29 Apr 2009
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:05 am    Post subject: I have eaten raw Reply with quote

Several times I have eaten raw vegan for 9 months at a time without any problems. I have cured my self of several things that the doctors wanted to operate on with Chinese herbs and raw food. If some one wants to try this for the skin the best raw diet now is the 80 10 10. 80% calories from fruit and veggies 10% from protein and 10% from fats. Such as nuts. if you google 80 10 10 there are videos and much else on it. They suggest up to a pound of greens a day. For me that is a lot of eating so I just make blended salads in my vita mix blender. Good luck

.
Back to top
View user's profile
cjdavis



Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 196
Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 12:10 pm    Post subject: Re: I have eaten raw Reply with quote

SteveF wrote:
Several times I have eaten raw vegan for 9 months at a time without any problems. I have cured my self of several things that the doctors wanted to operate on with Chinese herbs and raw food. If some one wants to try this for the skin the best raw diet now is the 80 10 10. 80% calories from fruit and veggies 10% from protein and 10% from fats. Such as nuts. if you google 80 10 10 there are videos and much else on it. They suggest up to a pound of greens a day. For me that is a lot of eating so I just make blended salads in my vita mix blender. Good luck

.


Couple of thoughts. Chinese herbs may help some people but they are not standardized and often "whole herbs" meaning that they haven't been extracted to key active constituents. That makes me wonder if you can get enough of the actives into the bloodstream. I realize that many of the chinese herbal therapies have supposedly been refined and tweaked for "thousands of years" but i'd personally need to have controlled studies before i would just buy into every Chinese herbal therapy. Not saying that you did, just musing.

I agree that adding moderate amounts of raw foods is beneficial for health and probably even promotes healing through various pathways in the body. Sometimes this is simply because a sudden influx of fruits and veggies replaces high calorie foods with nutrient dense ones, which results in a lower caloric intake and weight loss with the weight loss being the major component driving the healing. Other times i suspect its the micronutreints and various antioxidants that are performing beneficial functions to promote healing. i tend to shy away from the claims of fasting and enzymes that sequester energy from the body that normally is used for digestion and instead focuses the energy for healing; those claims are full of holes and simplistic reductionist explanations of physiology that are without cogency in my opinion.

The hard and fast rules of 80-10-10 seem very, very contrived and sort of just arbitrary and plucked out of thin air, which is often the case in fringe nutrition circles frankly. Also if you are eating say an 1800 calories diet at 10% protein, that's a whopping 45 grams of protein which is below that already antiquated and malnourished 50 grams the FDA recommends daily. You may hit 50 grams since there are trace amounts of protein in fruits and vegetables but still.

I would suggest that adding moderate amounts of "living" or raw fruits and vegetables is a great health practice that may promote healing and wellness outside of the currently known mechanisms but i can't jump on board with these concrete and absolute recommendations for specific percentages and whatnot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
SteveF



Joined: 29 Apr 2009
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2009 2:25 am    Post subject: reply to cjdavis Reply with quote

cjdavis

What a reply. Your obviously on this forum to learn more than what the doctors know or you would just listen to them. Most the info is from other members which is anecdotal. What is your expertise other than exposing what some authoritarian AMA experts only know? The last place I would go for curing cancer is an AMA doctor.

Have you tried eating 100% raw organic fruit for 9 months? Have you eaten raw vegan for 9 months several times? Have you tried fasting for 10 days, five days and several times for 3 days on just water? Have you tried the 80 10 10 for a couple weeks to see what happened? I have.

Have you used Chinese medicine that has trained doctors using a form of medicine that is over 3000 yr old not just the oil based chemicals that doctors use now for only the last hundred years that have dozens of side effects listed on each one? Have you ever thought that the whole herb is more powerful than just some single extracted part? Have you separated your shoulder at 55 and the doctors told you would never be healed perfectly and then ate raw and took Chinese medicine and then feel no different than at 21 yr old and pain free? Have you ever had your whole urinary system shut down and the butcher doctors wanted to operate upon your prostate and ruin your sex life at 56 yet by taking some conventional muscle relaxers, Chinese herbs, acupuncture and raw food that now 2 year later it's like one is 21 and and has no more problems. Have you ever had a low grade fever and a slight internal ear ache for three days at 45 and went to a Chinese doctor and was cured in less than 4 hours from a brain infection that the regular doctors would of been too late to stop with antibiotics so I didn't die?(can't totally verify this but the symptoms of an infection was there) I have

Have you spent 15 hours on the net studying ever thing you can find on the 80 1010 diet? Have you read and seen the man who developed it and his condition at his age of plus 58 and that he has been training athletes for 20 years? Have you spent hours looking at videos on youtube of the the people that have tried this and the creator of it? I have

What is your personal expertise and experimentation to say what you have?

:?:
Back to top
View user's profile
cjdavis



Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 196
Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:47 am    Post subject: Re: reply to cjdavis Reply with quote

Quote:
What a reply. Your obviously on this forum to learn more than what the doctors know or you would just listen to them. Most the info is from other members which is anecdotal. What is your expertise other than exposing what some authoritarian AMA experts only know? The last place I would go for curing cancer is an AMA doctor.


Where would you go then if you had, say metastatic prostate cancer? My profession is cancer research and I am knee deep in all phases of clinical trials that range from adjuvant to 4th line therapies for metastatic disease. I completely understand your aversion to the dogmatic components of American medicine and I'd be happy to make common cause with you over these nuances surrounding such. I walk in lock step with many people who are disenfranchised with the intractable dogma of the AMA but I part company with those who feel that "nature has all the answers." I really feel that these people tend to be credulous, to be frank and steeped in their bias for alternative approaches. I'm certainly not leveling that at you, but i've been immersed in the alt. med. community long enough to identify predominate behavioral themes.
You struck a nerve with me when you wrote about seeking non AMA treatment as I assumed you were referring to alternative treatment, an admittedly broad category. I think the increasingly common skepticism from allopathic medicine detractors that pharmaceutical approaches to cancer treatment are ineffective at best and outright fraudulent at worst reflects a dangerous an virulent strain of alt med that seriously misleads patients and causes them to seek unproven and ineffective treatments for a terminal disease. I take real issue with the utterances of the members of that community for a variety or reasons that I don't have time to get into. But I will say that while there may be a few gems in the dietary supplement world that have a place in assuaging the side effects of cancer or its allopathic pharmaceutical treatment of, that most of the alt treatments are completely bunk. Cancer is an amazingly complex disease to treat and most people who proffer alt. treatment options have no respect for this fact. There are cytotoxic drugs that destroy some types of cancer in vitro and in vivo that are completely ineffective at increasing progression free survival or overall survival in other types of cancer. Some chemo drugs that eradicate colorectal cancer won't even touch breast or prostate cancer; you have to test each drug against each type of cancer for efficacy to generate any morally or scientifically feasible treatment options. Saying that EGCG from green tea or a blend of Chinese herbs will treat whatever cancer ails you is just negligent. Even with the most advanced and rigorous clinical trials we don't know to a certainty. I just finished 3 large scale trials using VEGF inhibitors. If you look at the proposed mechanism of actions you could deduce a priori that these drugs would be effective for all cancers since they work in part through inhibiting angiogenesis. Guess what, they don't. Same goes for natural approaches, if they work at all.

Quote:
Have you tried eating 100% raw organic fruit for 9 months? Have you eaten raw vegan for 9 months several times? Have you tried fasting for 10 days, five days and several times for 3 days on just water? Have you tried the 80 10 10 for a couple weeks to see what happened? I have.


No, and I still say there is no reason to eat a vegan diet. My belief is you can duplicate the health promoting mechanisms from a vegetarian and raw food diet by adding them to a meat including diet. The belief that eating meat is poisonous to the body is absurd and lacks any cogency. it doesn't deplete your digestive enzymes. It doesn't deposit hormones deep into the cells of your body (try taking oral testosterone or GH and then take a blood test and see how much sneaks past the liver into systemic circulation). Guess what, I drink pasteurized skim milk and add pure casein to my diet. I even put sucralose in my coffee and tea at times. I also eat 150 - 200 grams of protein per day (norma BUN and creatinine levels, fyi) and I have 8% body fat (see bodyspace.bodybuilding.com/FORtheCURE/) I also have perfect cholesterol profiles, low blood pressure, low resting heart rate, etc. etc.
Fasting may have some benefits but I suspect they have more to do with glycogen depleting and the elimination of processed and high fat foods verses any absurd "detoxing" functions. I’ve posted on here before that detoxing cleanses, supplements, foot baths, patches, etc are a complete scam.

Quote:
Have you used Chinese medicine that has trained doctors using a form of medicine that is over 3000 yr old not just the oil based chemicals that doctors use now for only the last hundred years that have dozens of side effects listed on each one?

I'm open to the possibility that some sort of refinement and tweaking has occurred during the 3000 years but I’m still skeptical. Without placebo controlled double blind studies....i dunno. Take a class in human perception and you will see how fallible the anecdotal refinement approach to medicine is. The problem is that Chinese medicine is encumbered with unsubstantiated concepts that have not been verified by science and in the case of energy meridians, completely debunked. Doe sit make all of CM bunk? No. does it make me highly skeptical? Yes. But I will concede that I do not know a lot about it so maybe you can enlighten me.

Quote:
Have you ever thought that the whole herb is more powerful than just some single extracted part?


Yes, but you still need a threshold amount of the predominantly active constituent to elicit a physiological effect. This is pharmacokinetic fact, not speculation. Some whole herbs have enough of the active constituents; others need to be heavily extracted to reach effective amounts.

Quote:
Have you separated your shoulder at 55 and the doctors told you would never be healed perfectly and then ate raw and took Chinese medicine and then feel no different than at 21 yr old and pain free? Have you ever had your whole urinary system shut down and the butcher doctors wanted to operate upon your prostate and ruin your sex life at 56 yet by taking some conventional muscle relaxers, Chinese herbs, acupuncture and raw food that now 2 year later it's like one is 21 and and has no more problems. Have you ever had a low grade fever and a slight internal ear ache for three days at 45 and went to a Chinese doctor and was cured in less than 4 hours from a brain infection that the regular doctors would of been too late to stop with antibiotics so I didn't die?(can't totally verify this but the symptoms of an infection was there) I have

Have you spent 15 hours on the net studying ever thing you can find on the 80 1010 diet? Have you read and seen the man who developed it and his condition at his age of plus 58 and that he has been training athletes for 20 years? Have you spent hours looking at videos on youtube of the the people that have tried this and the creator of it? I have

What is your personal expertise and experimentation to say what you have?


Look, I get that you had a bad run and found good treatment from Chinese medicine. I’m sincerely glad for you. But it's my personality to take a parting shot so here goes; you MUST have had a brain infection to seek Chinese medicine...for a brain infection. Pass me the I.V. cipro stat.
But seriously, I love many alt. med approaches and I use them all the time. I just recommended some rhodiola to a chemo patient and he came back to tell me how much it improved his energy. I feel so much better when I eat raw and living foods and vegetable juices and I can tell a difference in my skin, energy and general health when I skip a few days. I just don’t think that it’s the absence of cooked foods and meat that is making the difference. I don’t doubt that many people lose weight and feel great on raw food diets (they’ve lowered their caloric intake astronomically and eliminated inflammatory foods by doing so) however I believe that you can get the same results my adding raw and living foods to a lean protein based diet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address
drtodorov
Site Admin


Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 2896

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The difference between "medical" and "natural" methods is artificial. There are only things that work and things that do not. And that should be determined via scientific method and properly designed studies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
charlesfunkel



Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If cooked food tastes good and you avert certain diseases like bird flu by cooking for a long time and at a high temperature, then I am sure that there is nothing wrong in having it.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Smart Skin Care Forum Index -> Skin and Nutrition All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group