View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rho67
Joined: 08 Feb 2006 Posts: 17
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
drtodorov Site Admin
Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Posts: 3177
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it is a valid concern and the question is to what degree this is an issue in vivo. In the meantime, it may be wise to avoid both UV exposure and DHA. However, it is likely that using DHA is still less harmful than unprotected sun exposure. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ddieringer
Joined: 21 Mar 2006 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are self-tanners and mystic tanning bad for your skin? I love to go mystic tanning, and I thought it was helping me to prevent wrinkles. Please let me know. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
drtodorov Site Admin
Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Posts: 3177
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you know what chemicals they use in "mystic tanning"? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ddieringer
Joined: 21 Mar 2006 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Dr. T, thanks so much for this site!! I'm not sure what's in all bronzers or mystic tanning booths. I looked online, and it said that mystic tanning solutions have three components, the bronzer, the DHA (dihydroxyacetone), and Aloe Vera.
After looking at a bottle of bronzer that I have at home, it also has the dihydroxyacetone. Is this bad? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
drtodorov Site Admin
Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Posts: 3177
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ddieringer wrote: |
After looking at a bottle of bronzer that I have at home, it also has the dihydroxyacetone. Is this bad? |
Well, the study discussed above in this thread raised a legitimate concern about DNA damage from DHA in the lab experiments. How much it is relevant to common human use is unclear, but some caution may be prodent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|