Smart Skin Care Forums
Home  -   Forum Index  -   Search  -   Register  -   Profile  -   Log in  -   FAQ  -   Contact Us

Micronized titanium/zinc safe?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Smart Skin Care Forum Index -> Basic Skin Care / Skin Health Maintenance
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mattc



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:13 pm    Post subject: Micronized titanium/zinc safe? Reply with quote

Hello

I've heard that there may be safety concerns with micronized titanium dioxide and zinc oxide, because the "nanoparticles" can penetrate the skin and cause damage....Is there any validity to this?
Back to top
View user's profile
orangehrzn



Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 1005

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Micronized Zinc has particles in the range 100-200 nm. This is the size of some viruses. As far as I understand viruses don't penetrate skin physically, they need 'receptors' to pull themselves inside the cells.
Back to top
View user's profile
drtodorov
Site Admin


Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 3177

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's right. Even individual proteins, which are smaller than that, generally do not penetrate skin significantly. Besides, zinc in microgram amount is relatively non toxic. (Although titanium might be if absorbed)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mattc



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the responses! I found a site that has micronized titanium dioxide that is supposedly in the 10 to 20 nm range....But it sounds like this isn't anything to worry about.
Back to top
View user's profile
drtodorov
Site Admin


Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 3177

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At least in theory, titanium has more potential for toxicity than zinc and 10 nm size might be small enough to penetrate under certain circumstances. Whether this represents any cinically significant danger is hard to say without running a study.

Last edited by drtodorov on Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
orangehrzn



Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 1005

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mattc, could you give the link of the site? 10nm size of Titanium dioxide is kind of hard to achieve with the current technology so I wanna check that out.
Back to top
View user's profile
mattc



Joined: 10 Mar 2006
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I found it on one of those ingredient supply sites:

www.makingcosmetics.com

Click Ingredients > Sunscreens. Scroll down to their Titanium Dioxide (micronized). The description states that the primary particle size is 10-20 nm. Could this be a typo...or false advertising?
Back to top
View user's profile
MC82



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can anyone point me in the right direction in finding out more about the benefits of zinc? Im about to try a new product and would love to learn more since I have never tried a zinc based serum before.
Back to top
View user's profile
orangehrzn



Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 1005

PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I searched the internet and it turned out that indeed there is Titanim Dioxide with particles about 10nm. We can't say if the one sold by the site has such particle size really. I would refrain from using TiO2 with such small particles till the controversy about it toxicity clears up.

I noticed also that the site sells micronized ZnO2, particle size < 200 nm at very acceptable price.

I bumped on the following article about the safety issues with the nanoparticles:
http://www.etcgroup.org/article.asp?newsid=392

Quote:
In 1997, scientists from Oxford (UK) and Montreal (Canada) isolated titanium dioxide nanoparticles from over-the-counter sunscreens and observed their behaviour when introduced to human cells. They found that these nanoparticles oxidized to produce hydroxyl radicals, which inflicted substantial damage to the cell’s DNA.(32) The concern

was that rather than averting skin cancer, the use of these nanoparticles instead threatened to exacerbate it. Although the upper layers of skin are dead, nanosized particles may be able to get into deeper layers of the skin, particularly if the skin is flexed during movement, as well as into hair follicles and wounds.(33)


Quote:
Another possible portal of entry into the body is via the skin. A number of sunscreen
preparations are now available which incorporate nano-particle titanium dioxide (TiO2).
Recent studies (Tinkle et al., 2003) have shown that particles of up to 1 µm in diameter
(i.e. within the category of “fine” particles) can get deep enough into the skin to be taken
up into the lymphatic system, while particles larger than that did not. The implication is
that ultrafine particles can and will be assimilated into the body through the skin. The
exact proportion of those deposited which will be absorbed remains unknown. Tinkle et
al. (2003) have studied the penetration of dextran beads into postmortem human skin
and demonstrated that 0.5 µm and 1 µm beads can penetrate the stratum corneum of
skin being flexed. This process affected over 50% of samples if the process continued for 1 hour. In a small proportion of case the beads got as far as the dermis.


Tinkle SS, Antonini JM, Rich BA, Roberts JR, Salmen R, DePree K, Adkins EJ (2003) ‘Skin
as a Route of Exposure and Sensitization in Chronic Beryllium Disease’, Environ.
Health Perspect. Online preprint. Online 24 February 2003 doi:10.1289/ehp.5999
(available at http://dx.doi.org/)

Here is the pdf file of the above article: http://www.ehponline.org/members/2003/5999/5999.pdf

Quote:
A summary of all data in this study
revealed that 0.5- and 1-µm beads penetrated
into the epidermis in 2 of 11 skin samples
(18%) flexed for 15 min, in 5 of 12 samples
(41%) flexed for 30 min, and in 9 of 16 samples
(56%) flexed for 60 min. Penetration into
the dermis occurred in two samples after flexing
60 min. The fluorospheres that penetrated
through the stratum corneum represent only a
small percentage of the applied beads, and the
pattern of penetration was random. In contrast
to skin samples with intact stratum corneum,
discontinuous stratum corneum permitted
entry of a bolus of beads directly under the tear
(Figure 2E). No particle penetration was
observed in nonflexed tissues at any time point
.



Another article to which I don't have access:
Lademann, J., H. Weigmann, C. Rickmeyer, H. Barthelmes, H. Schaefer, G. Mueller,
and W. Sterry (1999). ‘Penetration of titanium dioxide microparticles in a
sunscreen formulation into the horny layer and the follicular orifice.

Skin Pharmacol.Appl.Skin Physiol 12: 247-256.


Last edited by orangehrzn on Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
drtodorov
Site Admin


Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 3177

PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for finding such a study. This is in line with concerns expressed above. At this point, it wouild be wise to refrain from using TiO2 sunscreens with such nanoparticles.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
joey



Joined: 19 Dec 2005
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:05 pm    Post subject: titanium dioxide Reply with quote

Orangehrzn,

Thanks for this great info .
I am using Neutrogena sunblock SPF 30 it has titanium dioxide.... it is white when applied on my skin before outdoor exercise . Is this one ok ?
any suggestion for a good zinc sunscreen ?
Back to top
View user's profile
orangehrzn



Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 1005

PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The study whose pdf file I linked does NOT prove that nanoparticles penetrate stratum corneum under normal conditions. First, the skin in that study was bent at 45 degress 20 times per minute (it is not clear what exactly was meant by that), which may create microcrevices. Second if they observe penetration of even one particle in a given skin sample they count that sample as 'penetrated'. If you look at their pics the number of particles that penetrated is a few per sample versus god knows how many particles deposited on stratum corneum.

The study shows that under certain extreme conditions stratum corneum can be penetrated by a few particles but that is all. Notice they say that skin that wasn't bent wasn't penetrated in any of the samples. On the other hand, the smalles particle they studied was 0.5 micrometers = 500 nm, it is not clear if a particle of 10 nm would penetrate more.
Back to top
View user's profile
orangehrzn



Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 1005

PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I am using Neutrogena sunblock SPF 30 it has titanium dioxide.... it is white when applied on my skin before outdoor exercise . Is this one ok ?


I checked the ingredients on drugstore.com. It contains 9.1% titanium dioxide. Since they don't say it was micronized and since many people complained it is whitish on the skin, probably it is not micronized so it must be ok.

For suggestions about micronized zinc sunscreens see this thread

http://www.smartskincare.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1394
Back to top
View user's profile
MaryDarnell



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 1
Location: Miami, FL

PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:35 am    Post subject: a consideration when using zinc and titanium Reply with quote

You have to keep in mind that the Z-Cote micronized zinc oxide comes in two forms. There is z-cote and z-cote hp1. Z-cote is just the zinc oxide micronized, but the Z-Cote HP1 is zinc oxide coated with Triethoxycaprylysilane. I recommend just using a product with the regular micronized zinc oxide, it creates the same protection but isn't pasty (the z-cote hp1 with that Triethoxycaprylysilane coating I have found to be a little pasty, plus I don't know what the health ramifications are of that substance are). As far as Titanium Dioxide, I'd recommend just using regular instead of the microfine, especially considering it has a higher sun protection factor than zinc so you can use it at lower levels and still get a higher SPF. I asked the manufacturer about the SPF of zinc and titanium and they said in both the regular and micronized forms zinc oxide has about an SPF of 1 per 1% used (so if it was at 5% in a formula it would have an SPF of 5) however they said the Titanium (whether micronized or regular) was about 3 SPF points per 1% used, so an SPF of 15 would require 5% Titanium Dioxide. I'd say use a sunscreen with micronized Zinc Oxide but regular Titanium, then just use less titanium to keep from getting a pasty looks (such as maybe 3% titanium dioxide and 6% micronized zinc oxide for an SPF of 15). As long as the titanium is at 5% or less and the micronized zinc is at 7.5% or less it shouldn't be too pasty, though you may have to expirement with different products to find the least pasty one. I've had good results with the Sunguard Moisturizing Complex at xeridianskincare.com that has an SPF of 20 (it's for the face) and they have a body product with an SPF 15. Both are still a white lotion texture (not a clear gel or anything) but they don't leave me pasty. Both goes on a little white but after you smooth it over your face and body it disappears.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Smart Skin Care Forum Index -> Basic Skin Care / Skin Health Maintenance All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group