View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Twickle Purple
Joined: 18 Feb 2008 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sdguy wrote: | What's the URL of the rosacea forum?
$10K's a bit out of my range, I'm looking into my own basic system using LED bulbs around 630nm for overall skin health, reduced inflammation, and reduction of wrinkles would be great if it happens. |
The 10 grand was a hit, and most folks would find that a bit out of their comfort zone. I went with it because I could and it's been worth it. I also use LEDMAN, DPL, Tanda, Warp10, eBay devices, etc.
It is very important to note that while the large unit does kick start the healing process quicker, and is more convenient to use, after about a year the benefits from a large and small unit are equalized, as long as there is committed use. The skin tissue starts to respond very quickly but the changes are at the cellular level so visible healing and improvement can take 8 weeks to 3 months to see. This delay in gratification can cause people to become less diligent with application. Some folks realize a calming effect sooner -- but we all have different skin and influences. And, it's also important to keep in mind that the skin can only improve so much, we aren't going to be turning the clock back 15 years with this.
The first posts I really followed on this were by a fellow named IowaDavid at the Rosacea forum. He started with a smaller home made unit and then eventually built something larger. A few folks have posted about their home-built and/or customized units. It's the way to go if you are skilled in that area. One fellow was a terrific welder and did a static version of my dimalux, complete with fans (using small computer fans). It's all rather inspirational.
The forum is at: forum.rosaceagroup.org/index.php |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Plinka
Joined: 28 Feb 2008 Posts: 2 Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:56 pm Post subject: cheap LED therapy |
|
|
You may want to check out this website about LED therapy:
heelspurs.com/led.html
Although he does not believe in LED therapy for wrinkles, their is some research to the contrary. I use a 50 wt. halogen spot light bulb as close to my face for about 5 minutes/day. This produces a wavelength between 600-900 nm, but will go into the far infrared spectrum which is what the doctors are now using for skin treatment. Basically, you're slightly burning your skin (without the UV damage) and then stimulating your skin to heal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twickle Purple
Joined: 18 Feb 2008 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NEVER use Halogen lamps folks.
LEDs for facial therapy are non-thermal, they DO NOT BURN YOUR SKIN.
I don't know what the deal is here.
Below a link to the rosacea forum if anyones interested.
rosaceagroup.org
Some of the discussions will be helpful to share with the members here. They deal with inflammation and the many treatments folks have tried. The LLLT (Red light therapy, etc.) section is very active. I post there, and will answer any questions you have, there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Plinka
Joined: 28 Feb 2008 Posts: 2 Location: San Antonio, TX
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:58 pm Post subject: Halogens |
|
|
Hi Twickle,
I'm confused. I went to the rosacea forum and read a couple of your posts and comments on halogens, but I didn't hear your write anything negative about it. Other than the heat, can you please briefly explain why we should never use a halogen spot (which is covered in thick glass). Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|