Intelligent anti-aging skin care based on independent research     
Lose wrinkles, keep your bank account!     
 
Skin Care 101
Skin Care Basics
Skin Protection
Skin Biology
Biology of Aging
Ingredient Guide
Skin & Nutrition
Skin Conditions
 
Anti-Aging Treatments
Topical Actives
Wrinkle Fillers
Noninvasive
Invasive
 
Skin Care Smarts
Smart Choices
Best Practices
Find Good Skin Doc
Quick Tips
Freebie Finder
 
Reviews & Research
Product Reviews
Provider Reviews
Skin Care Research
Clinical Trials
 
How-To Infopacks
Skin Rejuvenation
DIY Skin Care
Skin & Nutrition
Eye Skin Care
Longevity In a Pill
 
Community & Misc
Forums
Polls & Surveys
News and Updates
Search
 
   
You are here: Skin Care Research >

Is switching retinoids a sound strategy for the treatment of acne vulgaris?

Author: Gold LS, Colon LE, Johnson LA, Gottschalk RW

Author affiliation: Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.

Publication date & source: 2008.06, J Drugs Dermatol., 7(6 Suppl):s11-7.

Publication type: Clinical Trial, Phase IV; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial

Topical retinoids, such as adapalene gel and tazarotene cream, are considered first-line therapy for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Dermatologists often initiate adapalene gel treatment first, due to its good tolerability, followed by a switch to tazarotene cream in an effort to improve or hasten efficacy outcomes. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 daily regimens for the treatment of acne: adapalene 0.1% gel for 12 weeks and adapalene 0.1% gel for 6 weeks followed by tazarotene 0.1% cream for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the percent of reduction in total lesion counts posttreatment. Subjects ages 12 to 35 years with acne vulgaris were selected to participate in a 12-week, randomized, evaluator-blind study of once-daily therapy with adapalene 0.1% gel (n=101) or "switch therapy," adapalene 0.1% gel followed by tazarotene 0.1% cream (n=100). Adapalene-treated subjects achieved similar percent reductions in total lesion counts at week 12 compared to subjects receiving switch therapy, demonstrating the noninferiority of adapalene gel treatment (median difference: -3.57%; lower confidence limit [LCL]: -11.25). Adapalene gel was associated with fewer reports of cutaneous irritation, particularly for scaling and stinging/burning, and fewer treatment-related adverse events compared to switch therapy. The results of this study indicate that daily therapy with adapalene 0.1% gel for 12 weeks was noninferior to switch therapy.



Indexes of Skin Care Research Abstracts
by Subject Category Most Recent


Google
 
Web SmartSkinCare.com

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Ask a Question | Resources

Copyright © 1999-2009 by Dr. G. Todorov / SmartSkinCare.com
Site Disclaimer | Copyright Certification

   
-- advertisements --