Intelligent anti-aging skin care based on independent research     
Lose wrinkles, keep your bank account!     
 
Skin Care 101
Skin Care Basics
Skin Protection
Skin Biology
Biology of Aging
Ingredient Guide
Skin & Nutrition
Skin Conditions
 
Anti-Aging Treatments
Topical Actives
Wrinkle Fillers
Noninvasive
Invasive
 
Skin Care Smarts
Smart Choices
Best Practices
Find Good Skin Doc
Quick Tips
Freebie Finder
 
Reviews & Research
Product Reviews
Provider Reviews
Skin Care Research
Clinical Trials
 
How-To Infopacks
Skin Rejuvenation
DIY Skin Care
Skin & Nutrition
Eye Skin Care
Longevity In a Pill
 
Community & Misc
Forums
Polls & Surveys
News and Updates
Search

-- advertisements --
   
You are here: Skin Care Research >

Treatment of inflammatory facial acne with the 1,450 nm diode laser alone versus microdermabrasion plus the 1,450 nm laser: a randomized, split-face trial.

Author: Wang SQ, Counters JT, Flor ME, Zelickson BD

Author affiliation: Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, MN 55402, USA.

Publication date & source: 2006.02, Dermatol Surg., 32(2):249-55

Publication type: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The 1,450 nm laser has been effective in treating acne. Microdermabrasion may help treat acne and reduce skin barriers to increase the delivery rate of topical anesthetics. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pain associated with the treatment of inflammatory facial acne with the 1,450 nm laser alone versus microdermabrasion plus the 1,450 nm laser. METHODS: Twenty patients with facial acne were treated with the 1,450 nm laser alone and microdermabrasion plus the 1,450 nm laser in a randomized, split-face trial. RESULTS: Laser alone and microdermabrasion plus laser significantly reduced the total number of acne lesions. Mean reductions of 53.5% and 55.6% were found after three treatments for laser alone and microdermabrasion plus laser, respectively. Clinical improvement was maintained 12 weeks after the last treatment. Mean pain scores were 5.3 6 1.5 for microdermabrasion plus laser and 5.2 6 1.5 for laser alone. There was no statistical difference between treatment levels for efficacy or pain. There was an average 10% increase in sequential pain as the laser treatment progressed. CONCLUSION: The 1,450 nm laser is effective, well tolerated, and safe for treating facial acne. This small pilot study did not demonstrate increased clinical efficacy or decreased associated pain with the addition of microdermabrasion to treatment with the 1,450 nm laser. A larger study may be needed to demonstrate any additional benefit.



Indexes of Skin Care Research Abstracts
by Subject Category Most Recent


Google
 
Web SmartSkinCare.com

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Ask a Question | Resources

Copyright © 1999-2008 by Dr. G. Todorov / SmartSkinCare.com
Site Disclaimer | Copyright Certification

   
-- advertisements --