Intelligent anti-aging skin care based on independent research     
Lose wrinkles, keep your bank account!     
 
Skin Care 101
Skin Care Basics
Skin Protection
Skin Biology
Biology of Aging
Ingredient Guide
Skin & Nutrition
Skin Conditions
 
Anti-Aging Treatments
Topical Actives
Wrinkle Fillers
Noninvasive
Invasive
 
Skin Care Smarts
Smart Choices
Best Practices
Find Good Skin Doc
Quick Tips
Freebie Finder
 
Reviews & Research
Product Reviews
Provider Reviews
Skin Care Research
Clinical Trials
 
How-To Infopacks
Skin Rejuvenation
DIY Skin Care
Skin & Nutrition
Eye Skin Care
Longevity In a Pill
 
Community & Misc
Forums
Polls & Surveys
News and Updates
Search
 
   
You are here: Skin Care Research >

Comparative evaluation of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A and topical creams for treating moderate-to-severe glabellar rhytids.

Author: Beer KR

Author affiliation: Palm beach Esthetic Center, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, USA.

Publication date & source: 2006.02, Dermatol Surg., 32(2):184-97.

Publication type: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Several nonprescription products purport similar or better outcomes than botulinum toxin type A (Botox Cosmetic, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) for treating wrinkles, but these have not been documented in comparative clinical trials. Patients spend millions of dollars annually on the topical products, yet there are, to date, no data to support any of the claims made. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A with placebo and three topical products in treating moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. METHODS: This single-center, randomized, investigator-blinded, parallel study of 77 female subjects comprised five treatment groups: botulinum toxin type A, placebo injection, StriVectin-SD (Klein-Becker USA, Salt Lake City, UT, USA), DDF Wrinkle Relax (Doctor's Dermatologic Formula, HDS Cosmetics, Inc., Yonkers, NY, USA), and HydroDerm (Hydroderm, Beverly Hills, CA, USA). Baseline and follow-up visits (weeks 4, 8, and 12) assessed safety and key efficacy measures: blinded investigator assessment of glabellar line severity on the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), subjects' global assessment of overall change in appearance, subject ratings of glabellar-related self-perception pre- and post-treatment, and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: Botulinum toxin type A treatment consistently resulted in statistically significant reductions in wrinkle severity on the FWS than any comparator (p<.001). Statistically significant improvements were similarly observed for subject-reported outcomes and satisfaction with botulinum toxin type A treatment, whereas treatment with any of the three topical creams did not result in a significant difference from placebo. Three adverse events occurred in three subjects who received StriVectin-SD. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin type A provided significantly greater efficacy and patient satisfaction in the treatment of glabellar frown lines than StriVectin-SD, Wrinkle Relax, and HydroDerm, and in the objective measurements used, none of the topical preparations were better than botulinum toxin.



Indexes of Skin Care Research Abstracts
by Subject Category Most Recent


Google
 
Web SmartSkinCare.com

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Ask a Question | Resources

Copyright © 1999-2009 by Dr. G. Todorov / SmartSkinCare.com
Site Disclaimer | Copyright Certification

   
-- advertisements --