Intelligent anti-aging skin care based on independent research     
Lose wrinkles, keep your bank account!     
 
Skin Care 101
Skin Care Basics
Skin Protection
Skin Biology
Biology of Aging
Ingredient Guide
Skin & Nutrition
Skin Conditions
 
Anti-Aging Treatments
Topical Actives
Wrinkle Fillers
Noninvasive
Invasive
 
Skin Care Smarts
Smart Choices
Best Practices
Find Good Skin Doc
Quick Tips
Freebie Finder
 
Reviews & Research
Product Reviews
Provider Reviews
Skin Care Research
Clinical Trials
 
How-To Infopacks
Skin Rejuvenation
DIY Skin Care
Skin & Nutrition
Eye Skin Care
Longevity In a Pill
 
Community & Misc
Forums
Polls & Surveys
News and Updates
Search
 
   
You are here: Skin Care Research >

Anatomic location of hyaluronic acid filler material injected into nasolabial fold: a histologic study.

Author: Arlette JP, Trotter MJ

Author affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. drjohn@johnarlette.com

Publication date & source: 2008.06, Dermatol Surg., 34 Suppl 1:S56-62

BACKGROUND Products instilled within or beneath the skin to improve its physical features are known as fillers. The position of the filler within the skin is one determinant of the end cosmetic result. OBJECTIVE The objective was to histologically determine the anatomic location of injected hyaluronic acid (HA) filler within nasolabial fold (NLF) skin. METHODS AND MATERIALS Sixteen patients (12 females, 4 males; median age, 59 years) undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma of the NLF area consented to injection of Burow's triangle or dog-ear redundant skin with HA gel (Juvederm), ex vivo, in vivo, or in vivo with delayed (1-4 weeks) removal. Sections of alcohol-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and with Hale's colloidal iron for detection of acid mucins. Dermal thickness was measured and HA distribution assessed. RESULTS NLF dermal thickness was 1.37+/-0.27 mm (mean+/-SD), with a range of 1.04 to 1.86 mm. All 16 patients showed HA filler localized to the subcutis. In 9/16 tissue samples, some HA was present in the deep dermis, but filler was only observed in more superficial dermis in 1 patient. The thickness of injected filler was 2.11+/-0.63 mm, but filler was often transected at the specimen base. CONCLUSION The predominant localization of injected HA filler is within the subcutis. A relatively thin NLF dermal thickness, typically <1.50 mm, likely precludes accurate injection of filler into dermal collagen. The results suggest that dermal localization of HA filler products is not required for an excellent cosmetic result.



Indexes of Skin Care Research Abstracts
by Subject Category Most Recent


Google
 
Web SmartSkinCare.com

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Ask a Question | Resources

Copyright © 1999-2009 by Dr. G. Todorov / SmartSkinCare.com
Site Disclaimer | Copyright Certification

   
-- advertisements --