Intelligent anti-aging skin care based on independent research     
Lose wrinkles, keep your bank account!     
 
Skin Care 101
Skin Care Basics
Skin Protection
Skin Biology
Biology of Aging
Ingredient Guide
Skin & Nutrition
Skin Conditions
 
Anti-Aging Treatments
Topical Actives
Wrinkle Fillers
Noninvasive
Invasive
 
Skin Care Smarts
Smart Choices
Best Practices
Find Good Skin Doc
Quick Tips
Freebie Finder
 
Reviews & Research
Product Reviews
Provider Reviews
Skin Care Research
Clinical Trials
 
How-To Infopacks
Skin Rejuvenation
DIY Skin Care
Skin & Nutrition
Eye Skin Care
Longevity In a Pill
 
Community & Misc
Forums
Polls & Surveys
News and Updates
Search

-- advertisements --
   
You are here: Skin Care Research >

Evaluation of a calcium hydroxylapatite-based implant (Radiesse) for facial soft-tissue augmentation.

Author: Jansen DA, Graivier MH

Author affiliation: Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA. djansen@tulane.edu

Publication date & source: 2006.09, Plast Reconstr Surg., 118(3 Suppl):22S-30S, discussion 31S-33S.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue fillers have become increasingly prominent in the practice of facial aesthetic medicine. The authors sought to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of a calcium hydroxylapatite-based filler (Radiesse) for facial soft-tissue augmentation. METHODS: A total of 609 subjects received calcium hydroxylapatite injections in several facial areas: the nasolabial folds, marionette lines, oral commissure, cheeks, chin, lips, and radial lip lines. Follow-up patient satisfaction surveys were conducted at 6 months and again between 12 and 24 months. Treatment satisfaction was based on a scale of 1 (least satisfied) to 5 (most satisfied) using subjective self-evaluation of preoperative photographs. Subjects were also asked whether they would use the treatment again. Adverse events were recorded immediately after treatment and at follow-up visits. RESULTS: Of the total number of survey requests, 155 subjects provided 6-month follow-up data and 112 subjects provided long-term 12- to 24-month data. The average satisfaction rating at 6 months was 3.94. A total of 138 of 155 subjects (89 percent) at 6 months and 83 of 112 (74 percent) at 12 to 24 months stated that they would use the treatment again. The only side effect observed was the development of easily treated nodules, reported by 42 of 338 of lip mucosa augmentation subjects (12.4 percent) and six of 163 of subjects (3.7 percent) who had treatment for radial lip lines. The proportion of subjects with lip nodules decreased to 8.8 percent when the implant volume was decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The calcium hydroxylapatite-based implant is a safe, long-lasting, highly effective, and well-tolerated agent for many areas of facial soft-tissue augmentation.



Indexes of Skin Care Research Abstracts
by Subject Category Most Recent


Google
 
Web SmartSkinCare.com

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Ask a Question | Resources

Copyright © 1999-2008 by Dr. G. Todorov / SmartSkinCare.com
Site Disclaimer | Copyright Certification

   
-- advertisements --