Intelligent anti-aging skin care based on independent research     
Lose wrinkles, keep your bank account!     
 
Skin Care 101
Skin Care Basics
Skin Protection
Skin Biology
Biology of Aging
Ingredient Guide
Skin & Nutrition
Skin Conditions
 
Anti-Aging Treatments
Topical Actives
Wrinkle Fillers
Noninvasive
Invasive
 
Skin Care Smarts
Smart Choices
Best Practices
Find Good Skin Doc
Quick Tips
Freebie Finder
 
Reviews & Research
Product Reviews
Provider Reviews
Skin Care Research
Clinical Trials
 
How-To Infopacks
Skin Rejuvenation
DIY Skin Care
Skin & Nutrition
Eye Skin Care
Longevity In a Pill
 
Community & Misc
Forums
Polls & Surveys
News and Updates
Search

-- advertisements --
   
You are here: Skin Care Research >

Can patients treat themselves with a small novel light based hair removal system?

Author: Rohrer TE, Chatrath V, Yamauchi P, Lask G

Author affiliation: Skin Care Physicians of Chestnut Hill, 1244, Boylston street, Suite 302, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA. Trohrer@skincarephysicians.net

Publication date & source: 2003.01, Lasers Surg Med., 33(1):25-9.

Publication type: Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a small, low energy light based system for hair removal, when used by non-healthcare professionals ("patients") for self treatment in home-like environment following instructions and guidance provided by a physician. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 73 patients between the ages of 19 and 54 years with skin types I through IV were enrolled in the study out of which 67 completed the study. Two treatment sites were chosen from among the arms, axilla, legs, bikini, back, belly, chest or face. The hair on the sites was trimmed and photographed. Each patient performed two self-treatments, using the hair removal device on their designated body sites, under the Investigator's direction. The first self-treatment was performed at the Investigator's office by the patient while the second self-treatment was performed 4 weeks later at a hotel room, simulating the home environment. Follow-up visits to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatments were performed 2 and 12 weeks following the last self-treatment. RESULTS: The mean hair reduction was 33.6%, 4 weeks after the first self-treatment, 44.3%, 2 weeks following the last self-treatment, and 32.3%, 12 weeks following the last treatment. All the noted side effects were mild and transient. Transient erythema was noted in 47.5% of the patients. Other transient side effects reported include edema (5%), hyperpigmentation (4.75%), crusting (2.35%), hypopigmentation (1.55%), and blistering (1.4%). All noted side effects were resolved by the 12-week follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: With adequate training and instruction, patients may administer self-treatments for hair removal with this small light based unit in a safe and effective manner. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.



Indexes of Skin Care Research Abstracts
by Subject Category Most Recent


Google
 
Web SmartSkinCare.com

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Ask a Question | Resources

Copyright © 1999-2008 by Dr. G. Todorov / SmartSkinCare.com
Site Disclaimer | Copyright Certification

   
-- advertisements --