![]() |
|
|
|
You are here: Skin Care Research >
Author: Gross EA, Rogers GS
Author affiliation: Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts, USA.
Publication date & source: 1998.10, J Am Acad Dermatol., 39(4 Pt 1):547-53.
Publication type: Clinical Trial; Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: The use of cutaneous resurfacing lasers to treat rhytides is widely accepted. Several carbon dioxide lasers, many using fundamentally different technologies, are available. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the results obtained and side effects after treating rhytides with 3 different carbon dioxide resurfacing lasers. METHODS: We performed a randomized, blinded, prospective study wherein 16 subjects had either periorbital or perioral rhytides resurfaced with 1 of 3 carbon dioxide lasers on either side of the face. RESULTS: We were unable to demonstrate any significant differences in improvement in rhytides, patient satisfaction, posttreatment erythema, or other side effects. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that operator technique and patient selection are more important factors than laser type with respect to outcome.
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Ask a Question | Resources Copyright © 1999-2009 by Dr. G. Todorov / SmartSkinCare.com Site Disclaimer | Copyright Certification
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||