Intelligent anti-aging skin care based on independent research     
Lose wrinkles, keep your bank account!     
 
Skin Care 101
Skin Care Basics
Skin Protection
Skin Biology
Biology of Aging
Ingredient Guide
Skin & Nutrition
Skin Conditions
 
Anti-Aging Treatments
Topical Actives
Wrinkle Fillers
Noninvasive
Invasive
 
Skin Care Smarts
Smart Choices
Best Practices
Find Good Skin Doc
Quick Tips
Freebie Finder
 
Reviews & Research
Product Reviews
Provider Reviews
Skin Care Research
Clinical Trials
 
How-To Infopacks
Skin Rejuvenation
DIY Skin Care
Skin & Nutrition
Eye Skin Care
Longevity In a Pill
 
Community & Misc
Forums
Polls & Surveys
News and Updates
Search

-- advertisements --
   
You are here: Skin Care Research >

Q-switched ruby versus long-pulsed dye laser delivered with compression for treatment of facial lentigines in Asians.

Author: Kono T, Manstein D, Chan HH, Nozaki M, Anderson RR

Author affiliation: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan. tkono@prs.twmu.ac.jp

Publication date & source: 2006.02, Lasers Surg Med., 38(2):94-7.

Publication type: Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Q-switched lasers have been used for the treatment of lentigines but post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) can be an issue especially in Asians. The 595 nm long-pulsed dye laser (LPDL) has been used for the treatment of vascular lesions and although it is well absorbed by oxyhemoglobin, it is also absorbed by melanin. To use this device for the treatment of facial lentigines, we attached a flat glass lens to the tip of the laser's handpiece, allowing compression of the skin during treatment. In doing so, eliminated the absorption by oxyhemoglobin. This prospective study aims to compare the efficacy and complications of such an approach to the use of Q-switched ruby laser (QSRL) in the treatment of facial lentigines in Asians. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen Asian patients (1 male, 17 female) with facial lentigines Fitzpatrick skin types III-IV were enrolled. One of the lentigines present was treated with LPDL by compression method and the other one was treated with QSRL. A LPDL emitting wavelength of 595 nm, spot size of 7 mm was used, with fluence between 10 and 13 J/cm(2) and pulse duration of 1.5 milliseconds. Cryogen spray cooling was not used. A 694 nm QSRL was used with a spot size of 4 mm, fluence of 6-7 J/cm(2), and pulse duration of 30 nanoseconds. Lightening of the lesions was assessed by reflectance spectrometer Erythema, hypo- or hyperpigmentation and scarring were also assessed by clinical examinators. RESULTS: The degree of clearing achieved with the two lasers was 70.3% and 83.3% for QSRL and LPDL, respectively. All QSRL treated areas developed erythema whereas only 4 of 18 LPDL treated areas developed erythema. Hyperpigmentation was seen in four patients after QSRL, but not after LPDL. There was no scarring or hypopigmentation. CONCLUSIONS: LPDL delivered with a compression method is more effective than QSRL for facial lentigines. Complications after LPDL treatment were substantially less frequent than after QSRL. The addition of compression technique may allow "vascular" pulsed dye laser to be used for treating a variety of pigmented lesions. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.



Indexes of Skin Care Research Abstracts
by Subject Category Most Recent


Google
 
Web SmartSkinCare.com

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Ask a Question | Resources

Copyright © 1999-2008 by Dr. G. Todorov / SmartSkinCare.com
Site Disclaimer | Copyright Certification

   
-- advertisements --